
According to gossip columnist
Cindy Adams, the heartbreak kid is thinking the same way I've been thinking the last few months:
GORE lore. Not running but not out of the running. Oozing from his camp is he's lying low to enter as a white knight if the front-runners down the line knock each other out. After everyone else is beaten up he'd come in - like maybe Octoberish - because these days he has no negativity factor. No voting record to overcome, no positions on anything except the environment. And he's got millions. His own. Plus a team because, besides his book, documentary and another book due out on government, he's got concerts coming up, so he can get himself front-and-center onstage, in newspapers, covered by TV and wrapped around clean green fresh air, pure water, the flag and America's future.
Also, this guy already has a whole Internet base in place because he's got his own cable network in 30 million homes. Critics pooh-pooh'd Current TV two years ago when this San Fran-based channel developed the idea to air short videos cranked out by amateurs. Called it clueless, newsless, lifeless. A limp noodle. Well, today smartmouths are eating this limp noodle since it's now worth, give or take a few, a billion dollars.
In other words, he's ready to go . . . If . . .
Hillary, Barack, etc., started hardcore campaigning way too early this cycle. It's inevitable that they're going to beat each other up so much--or people will just get tired of hearing about them--that someone like Al will seem like a pine-scented breath of cool mountain air.
Here's just one example of the disasters still to befall us because Sir Al failed to slay the would-be monkey king in 2000. Yesterday, the Supreme Court upheld the ban on so-called partial birth abortions. From slate.com:
Father Knows Best
Dr. Kennedy's magic prescription for indecisive women.
The key to comprehending the Supreme Court's ruling today in Gonzales v. Carhart upholding the federal partial-birth abortion ban is a mastery not of constitutional law but of a literary type. Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion is less about the scope of abortion regulation than an announcement of an astonishing new test: Hereinafter, on the morally and legally thorny question of abortion, the proposed rule should be weighed against the gauzy sensitivities of that iconic literary creature: the Inconstant Female.
Kennedy invokes The Woman Who Changed Her Mind not once, but twice today. His opinion is a love song to all women who regret their abortions after the fact, and it is in the service of these women that he justifies upholding the ban ...
... With a stirring haiku about how "respect for human life finds an ultimate expression in the bond of love the mother has for her child," the justice interpolates himself between every one of those mothers and every child she might ever bear. Without regard for the women who feel they made the right decision in terminating a pregnancy, he frets for those who changed their minds. ("It seems unexceptionable to conclude some women come to regret their choice to abort the infant life they once created and sustained.") (The "infant," not the "fetus.") As both the dissenters and my colleague Emily Bazelon have pointed out, this portrayal of a rampant epidemic of regretful women may or may not be scientifically accurate. (The American Psychological Association doesn't think so.) But even if the numbers of women who would truly choose differently if they could choose again are larger than most of the medical literature indicates, one might question whether such women should be the pole star of national abortion policy ...
It's hard to fathom why Kennedy has so much more sympathy for the women who changed their minds about abortions than for those who did not. His concern for Inconstant Females might be patronizing in any other jurist. Coming from him, it's brilliantly ironic. Kennedy is, after all, America's Hamlet. The man who famously worried that "sometimes you don't know if you're Caesar about to cross the Rubicon or Captain Queeg cutting your own tow line," will long be remembered as the living incarnation of agony and indecision, And today he seamlessly rewrites his Stenberg dissent as a majority opinion that blasts his earlier Casey vote to its core.
I'm no psychologist but in light of today's Gonzales opinion one has to wonder: Is all of Kennedy's tender concern over those flip-flopping women really just some kind of weird misplaced justification for his flip-flopping self?
The fundies must be dancing on their knees. They got exactly what they wanted for kissing Dubya's moronic ass.
Turn ons: Al Gore's beard
Turn offs: Supreme Court justices cock-blocking every woman's right to a womb of her own